Skip to content
CollegeRanker

Head-to-Head Comparison

Stevens Institute of Technology vs Washington University in St Louis

Stevens Technology Wins
18
Tied
15
Washington St Wins
21

Direct Answer

For overall financial value, Washington University in St Louis offers a significantly safer investment tier. With an annual cost of $21,786 vs Stevens Institute of Technology's $41,346, Washington University in St Louis delivers strong outcomes at a fraction of the price. For students prioritizing lower student debt over initial institution prestige, Washington University in St Louis's lower price point delivers a highly efficient debt-to-earnings path.

54 data points compared · Sources: College Scorecard, Opportunity Insights, Times Higher Education, IPEDS

When to Pick Each School

Stevens Technology

  • Higher earnings: Median earnings of $108,772 ten years after enrollment, 26% more than Washington University in St Louis
  • Social mobility: Chetty mobility rate of 4.3%, the stronger record of moving students up the income ladder

Washington St

  • Lower cost: Average net price of $21,786, roughly $19,560 a year less
  • Higher grad rate: 94% of students finish, the higher completion rate of the pair
  • Less debt: Median debt of $17,500, the lower of the two
  • More selective: Admits 12% of applicants, which makes for a more competitive peer group

The Actual Decision

What are you really choosing between?

Stevens Technology graduates concentrate in Engineering (45% of degrees); Washington St in Engineering (14%). If you already know the field you want, the choice is mostly made for you.

If you want… Choose
Engineering Stevens Technology
Computer science & AI Stevens Technology
Lab & physical sciences Washington St
Economics & public policy Washington St
Pre-med & health Washington St
Psychology Washington St
Math & quantitative work Stevens Technology
Business & entrepreneurship Stevens Technology
Arts & design Either

Based on each school's share of degrees by field (College Scorecard). It shows where graduates actually concentrate, not the only path a school offers.

Which School Fits You?

Maximizing post-grad earnings → Stevens Institute of Technology

Pick Stevens Institute of Technology over Washington University in St Louis. Median earnings of $108,772 ten years after enrollment vs $86,182.

Keeping costs down → Washington University in St Louis

Pick Washington University in St Louis over Stevens Institute of Technology. Net price $21,786 vs $41,346.

Social mobility impact → Stevens Institute of Technology

Pick Stevens Institute of Technology over Washington University in St Louis. 4.3% mobility rate vs 1%.

Graduation certainty → Washington University in St Louis

Pick Washington University in St Louis over Stevens Institute of Technology. 94% completion rate vs 88%.

Key Metrics at a Glance

Graduation Rate

88%
Stevens Technology
vs
94%
Washington St

Earnings (10yr)

$108,772
Stevens Technology
vs
$86,182
Washington St

Avg Net Price

$41,346
Stevens Technology
vs
$21,786
Washington St

Median Debt

$27,000
Stevens Technology
vs
$17,500
Washington St

The Analysis

Verdict

Stevens Institute of Technology and Washington University in St Louis are close on paper, but Washington University in St Louis wins the head-to-head, leading on 4 of the core measures (selectivity, cost, earnings, completion, mobility, and debt). The right pick still depends on how you weight them.

Getting in

Washington University in St Louis is the harder admit. It takes 12% of applicants, while Stevens Institute of Technology takes 48%. Its entering class also posts the higher average SAT, 1,446 to 1,530.

So what: If test scores and a high-scoring peer group matter to you, Washington University in St Louis sets the higher bar. The less selective school is easier to get into, which can work in your favor rather than against it.

What it costs

On price, Washington University in St Louis comes out ahead. Its average net price after aid is $21,786, about $19,560 a year below Stevens Institute of Technology's $41,346. Graduates of Washington University in St Louis also borrow less: median debt of $17,500, against $27,000.

So what: Over four years, the gap adds up to about $78,240 before any change in aid. Choosing Washington University in St Louis leaves that money available for graduate school, savings, or simply less borrowing.

What graduates earn

Ten years after enrollment, Stevens Institute of Technology graduates report median earnings of $108,772, compared with $86,182 at Washington University in St Louis. That is a 26% advantage. Set against borrowing, Washington University in St Louis has the lower debt-to-earnings ratio, 0.2x to 0.25x.

So what: An earnings gap of 26% this early in a career tends to widen, since raises build on the higher base. Of the measures on this page, this one carries the most financial weight.

Finishing the degree

Washington University in St Louis graduates a larger share of its students, 94% versus 88%. More of its students stay on track to a degree.

So what: A completion gap of 6% is a risk measure. Students at the school with the lower rate face higher odds of leaving with debt and no degree, the most expensive outcome in higher education.

Moving people up

Stevens Institute of Technology does more to move students up the income ladder. Its Chetty mobility rate is 4.3%; at Washington University in St Louis, it is 1%. Stevens Institute of Technology also enrolls the larger share of low-income students: 6.9% come from the bottom income quintile, versus 1.9%.

So what: For first-generation and low-income students, Stevens Institute of Technology offers the stronger statistical shot at reaching the top of the income distribution. The gap is wide enough to weigh in any access-minded decision.

Recommendation

Bottom line: pick Washington University in St Louis to keep costs and debt down; pick Stevens Institute of Technology for the higher earnings ceiling.

Data certainty: High. Both schools report 6 of 6 core signals used here, so every comparison above matches reported data against reported data.

Counterintuitive Insights

!

The cheaper school is not the lower-earning one here. Washington University in St Louis saves about $19,560 a year, yet Stevens Institute of Technology graduates earn $22,590 more ten years after enrollment. The cost advantage and the earnings premium sit at different schools, so your time horizon decides which counts more.

!

Washington University in St Louis is harder to get into, with a 12% admit rate, but Stevens Institute of Technology posts the higher mobility rate, at 4.3%. Selectivity and income mobility measure different things; here, the easier admit does more for the low-income students it enrolls.

!

Their academic identities diverge. Stevens Institute of Technology concentrates enrollment in Computer Science & IT, Business & Marketing, while Washington University in St Louis leans toward Biology & Biomedical, Social Sciences. That split shapes which recruiters come to campus and what your classmates study.

Who Should Look Elsewhere

Stevens Technology Not for everyone
  • Cost-conscious students: net price of $41,346 runs well above Washington University in St Louis's $21,786.
  • Students minimizing debt: median debt is $27,000, against $17,500 at Washington University in St Louis.
Washington St Not for everyone
  • STEM and CS-focused students: tech programs are a smaller part of Washington University in St Louis's enrollment, and Stevens Institute of Technology is stronger here.
  • Students who want a smaller campus: Washington University in St Louis's enrollment of 7,857 far exceeds Stevens Institute of Technology's 4,222.

Full Data Breakdown

Inside the admissions office

Washington St holds onto its admits more tightly: 48% of admitted students enroll, versus 21% at Stevens Technology — a sign of how often it wins head-to-head choices. Washington St offers a binding Early Decision round that can lift your odds; Stevens Technology does not, so there is no early-commitment lever to pull there. Test scores matter less at Stevens Technology, where only about 43% of enrolled freshmen submitted any SAT or ACT.

Source: each school's published Common Data Set, via collegedata.fyi.

Overview
5 metrics
Private nonprofit
Type
Private nonprofit
Suburban
Setting
Suburban
Mid-Atlantic
Region
Plains
4,222
Enrollment
7,857
No
HBCU
No
Admissions
4 metrics
48%
Acceptance Rate
12%
1446
SAT Average
1530
33
ACT Midpoint
34
1380-1505
SAT Range
1500-1570
Admissions Strategy (Common Data Set)
6 metrics
21%
Yield Rate
48%
36%
SAT Submitted
32%
6%
ACT Submitted
29%
Not offered
Early Decision
Offered
ED Admit Rate
27.0%
ED Share of Class
485%
Cost & Financial Aid
9 metrics
$63,462
In-State Tuition
$65,790
$63,462
Out-of-State Tuition
$65,790
$41,346
Average Net Price
$21,786
$27,221
Net Price ($0-30K income)
$1,716
$27,603
Net Price ($30-48K)
$1,928
$33,102
Net Price ($48-75K)
$5,578
$49,538
Net Price ($110K+)
$42,170
20%
Pell Grant Rate
18%
53%
Federal Loan Rate
12%
Academics
5 metrics
88%
Graduation Rate
94%
94%
Retention Rate
95%
100%
Full-Time Faculty
73%
$17,610
Faculty Salary (monthly)
$16,945
15%
First-Gen Students
11%
Student Body
6 metrics
28%
Female
53%
47%
White
40%
17%
Hispanic
13%
3%
Black
9%
21%
Asian
21%
0.71
Diversity Index
0.76
Outcomes
6 metrics
$90,326
Earnings (6yr)
$78,073
$100,949
Earnings (8yr)
$81,347
$108,772
Earnings (10yr)
$86,182
$27,000
Median Debt
$17,500
0.25x
Debt-to-Earnings
0.2x
89%
Earning Above HS Grad
84%
Social Mobility (Chetty)
4 metrics
4.29%
Mobility Rate
1.04%
62.5%
Success Rate (bottom 20%)
53.5%
6.9%
From Bottom 20%
1.9%
$130,430
Parent Median Income (today's $)
$244,829
Social Capital
3 metrics
1.80
Economic Connectedness
1.83
0.00
Friending Bias
0.00
4.9%
Volunteering Rate
11.1%
Research (Times HE)
4 metrics
World Rank
#38
Teaching Score
58.9
Research Score
63
Citations Score
88.6
Online Education (IPEDS)
2 metrics
10.7%
% Exclusively Online
5.6%
60.5%
% Any Online
24.2%

The Overviews

Stevens Institute of Technology

Hoboken, NJ · Private nonprofit

48% accept 88% grad $108,772 earnings $41,346 net

Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, NJ, is a great fit for students who are driven by a passion for technology and innovation. With 4,222 enrolled students and an acceptance rate of 48%, it attracts individuals looking for a solid education in fields like Engineering, Computer Science, Business, and the Arts. One standout aspect is the school's high graduation rate of 88%, which speaks volumes about student support and engagement throughout their academic journey.

After graduation, students from Stevens can expect impressive earning potential, with an average salary of $108,772 within ten years of completing their degree. This financial success reflects the value of a degree from Stevens, especially in high-demand areas like engineering and tech. The cost of attendance can be manageable, particularly when considering the school’s financial aid options, though it's important to weigh the net price against potential earnings.

When looking at the practical aspects of attending Stevens, the net price after aid stands at $41,346, which means students should prepare for a significant investment. Graduates typically carry a median debt of $27,000. The environment here tends to be ideal for those who are eager to engage with their studies and are committed to making the most of their college experience. This is a community that thrives on ambition and collaboration, setting students up for success both during and after their time at Stevens.

Washington University in St Louis

St. Louis, MO · Private nonprofit

12% accept 94% grad $86,182 earnings $21,786 net

With an acceptance rate of just 12%, Washington University in St. Louis attracts driven students looking for a rigorous academic environment. It’s a great fit for those interested in fields like engineering, biology, social sciences, computer science, and business. The graduation rate of 94% reflects a supportive community that helps students succeed and achieve their goals.

Life after graduation looks promising, with alumni reporting an average earnings of $86,182 ten years out. This figure highlights the potential for financial stability in a variety of career paths. While nearly 18% of students receive Pell Grants, the school’s commitment to affordability helps ensure that students from different economic backgrounds can thrive.

On the financial side, the net price after aid stands at $21,786, and the median debt for graduates is $17,500. This manageable debt load suggests that students here often leave school with a solid foundation for their financial futures. Those who tend to thrive are often self-motivated and eager to engage deeply with their studies and the campus community.

Rankings They Appear On

Stevens Institute of Technology and Washington University in St Louis appear together in 2 rankings. On the Highest-Paying Colleges for Visual, Stevens Institute of Technology ranks #2 — Stevens Institute of Technology outranks Washington University in St Louis by 12 positions.

Explore all rankings →

Top Degree Programs

Both schools share Mechanical Engineering as their top enrolled program field, comprising 45% of Stevens Technology's student body and 14% of Washington St's.

Career Pathways

Program strengths at these schools feed into careers like Software Developer, Data Scientist, Cybersecurity Analyst (for Stevens Technology) and Software Developer, Data Scientist, Cybersecurity Analyst (for Washington St).

The two schools feed different job markets. Stevens Institute of Technology is strongest in Computer Science & IT, Mathematics & Statistics, while Washington University in St Louis concentrates in Biology & Biomedical, Social Sciences. Those concentrations determine which recruiters show up on campus and where alumni cluster by industry. Match the school's program strengths to the field you plan to enter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it harder to get into Stevens Institute of Technology or Washington University in St Louis?

Washington University in St Louis is harder to get into, admitting 12% of applicants compared with 48% at Stevens Institute of Technology.

Which is more affordable, Stevens Institute of Technology or Washington University in St Louis?

Washington University in St Louis is more affordable, with an average net price of $21,786 after aid versus $41,346 at Stevens Institute of Technology.

Do Stevens Institute of Technology or Washington University in St Louis graduates earn more?

Stevens Institute of Technology graduates earn more: median earnings of $108,772 ten years after enrollment, versus $86,182 at Washington University in St Louis.

Which has a better graduation rate, Stevens Institute of Technology or Washington University in St Louis?

Washington University in St Louis has the higher graduation rate, 94% versus 88%.

Stevens Institute of Technology vs Washington University in St Louis: which is better for social mobility?

Stevens Institute of Technology is the stronger driver of upward mobility, with a Chetty mobility rate of 4.3% versus 1%.

Should you choose Stevens Institute of Technology or Washington University in St Louis?

It depends on what you weigh most. Choose Washington University in St Louis if affordability and lower debt come first; choose Stevens Institute of Technology if you're optimizing for post-grad earnings. The two schools win on different measures, so the better fit is the one whose strengths match your priorities.

More Comparisons

View all →

Weigh Your Options

Best Colleges in America

How do Stevens Technology and Washington St stack up against regional and national alternatives when evaluated on pure socioeconomic mobility, graduate earnings, and long-term return on investment? Explore the full, verified dataset on our comprehensive rankings directory.

Search More Programs
The State of American Higher Education Outcomes for 2026 — report cover Download PDF

The 2026 Annual Report

The State of American Higher Education Outcomes

Every state graded on what graduates earn, how far they climb, and what college really costs — the hidden geography of economic mobility, in one report.

Free · 21 pages · 5,745 institutions · 100% federal data, no surveys